 |
| Paul Krugman |
too writes:Rescinding DACA helps nobody exactly racists https://t.co/Krl8tWEIyu— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) September 8, 2017
Trump’s determination to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is, higher upwards all else, immoral. The 800,000 beneficiaries of DACA — the so-called Dreamers — haveKrugman is absolutely right inwards that at that topographic point is no economical argue to boot out dreamers (SEE:The Problem alongside Stephen Miller).
done goose egg wrong; they came to the U.S. of A. of America illegally, exactly non of their ain volition, because they were children at the time.
They are, according to all available data, an exemplary segment of our population: hard-working immature people, many seeking to amend themselves through higher education. They’re committed to the values of their habitation — because America is their home.
To yank the carpet out from nether the Dreamers — mayhap fifty-fifty to role the information they supplied voluntarily to harass too comport them — is a fell betrayal. And it’s self-evidently driven past times racial hostility. Does anyone believe this would live on happening if the typical Dreamer had been born in, say, Kingdom of Norway rather than Mexico?...
[L]etting Dreamers function is all economical upside for the remainder of our nation, alongside no downside unless you lot convey something against people alongside chocolate-brown pare too Hispanic surnames. Which is, of course, what this is all actually about.
It is hard to debate alongside Krugie here. He
-RW
Sumber http://www.targetliberty.com/